0.79 in. I am shopping for a mic for recording acoustic guitar.

What is or what would be the music equivalent of a #WritersLift that can easily go viral? Mic sounds are a matter of taste but I happen to still like the good ol SM81 ... even if there are 'better' options out there.

One more question I will ask before I settle on mics since I can NOT demo NT 5's in any way shape or form.

Still have questions? 0.79 in. Here's the SM81's frequency response, according to recordinghacks.com: General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion, http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/QTC30MP, http://http://www.shure.co.uk/suppor...polar_patterns, http://http://www.shure.co.uk/suppor...ansducer_types, https://soundcloud.com/doug-young/at2020-noodle, http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/C4mic. There's a pair of NT5 on eBay that may go cheap (I am not associated with the seller). But that is just me, they are certainly worth checking out.

I want to get the fullest sound possible so I'm wondering would it be better to record with 1 Shure SM81 or 2 Rode NT5 mics with the XY pattern. Being a productive member of society and encouraging others to do the same. I have used Rode NTK and Rode NT1-A with pretty decent results.

Sound Reinforcement - Forums for Live Sound Professionals - Your Displayed Name Must Be Your Real Full Name To Post In The Live Sound Forums, Topic: Overhead Mics: Shure SM94 or Rode NT5  (Read 11213 times), Re: Overhead Mics: Shure SM94 or Rode NT5.

Shure SM81 vs Rode NT5 . I have used Rode NTK and Rode NT1-A with pretty decent results. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. The Studio Projects C4 is another good value small diaphragm condenser pair to consider. A pair of NT5s go for about 400.

A NT5 stereo pair in the XY configuration would sound a lot better than the SM81. OHD - nt5 or even the lower priced m5.

For the purpose SM81 is a better choice. There is, however NT5 'version' with pad which works perfectly. They always worked well for me and I liked them better than the 81s. I thought proximity meant closer than 2 feet.

I have used Rode NTK and Rode NT1-A with pretty decent results. Rode NT5 vs Shure SM81.

0.79 in. Thanks everyone. Very interesting. I find the response quite flat ... no hype and the reproduction very accurate and predicable.

I didn't know that cardioid described a pattern.

Do The Beatles not have a signature song?

I'm looking for a condenser mic to record solo acoustic guitar tracks. Copyright ©2000 - 2020, The Acoustic Guitar Forum. I've been a long time fan of the SM81's for hat service and OH's, but I recently started reading more into the Rode NT5's for this and beginning to wonder if these mic's do just as good as the SM81's? Seeing as how the Behringer C2 is pretty much a copy of the Rode NT5 I would put my money on the Rodes's NT5.

What happened to Gerry Polci on that one night in late December back in '63? Never used an NT5 but when I was playing drums on the road I always used an 81 as my overhead and hi-hat mic and I love that mic. Thanks everyone. A few years I was recording guitar and violin and my mic of choice then was the SM81. But I am interested in a small diaphragm mic. The SM81 is about 350 new. I am not quite up to speed on what a cardioid mic vs condensor is. Rode NT5. Any feedback would be appreciatied. thanks for the info on patterns Doc. The NT5 is also a pencil condenser, so it often gets used on drums as well. I am shopping for a mic for recording acoustic guitar.

I am not quite up to speed on what a cardioid mic vs condensor is. http://www.soundforums.net/profile.php?do=editprofile. Shure SM81. I thought it was some type of element or something. *Acoustic guitar recording tip: when you put the mics in the XY configuration place them 8-20" away from the 12th fret. I’ve used the NT5 for hat, snare bottom, and overhead duties a lot.

Comparison of Rode NT55 and Shure SM81 based on specifications, reviews and ratings. I borrowed a pair of NT5's for a while, ended up not liking their sound that much.

just roll out some highs. I am shopping for a mic for recording acoustic guitar. my NT-5 mics are the ones I would least like to be without.

The NT5's haven't come out of the case since I started using Shure Beta 27's as overheads. And hopefully the mic will reproduce that.

I would suggest buying from a place with a good return policy, just in case you don't like them. This is the magical spot for recording acoustics. Cowboys strength coach Markus Paul dies at 54, Pat Sajak apologizes for outburst on 'Wheel of Fortune', Women raise voices amid increase in domestic violence, Ken Jennings called out for past insensitive tweets, Retailers shortchanged workers despite profit boom, Coronavirus is now a coast-to-coast disaster, Walmart's massive Black Friday sale just went live, Experts push CDC to shorten COVID-19 quarantine, Critic of FBI calls Trump's election moves 'despicable', Steelers sound off after primetime game postponed, Trump loyalist leads controversial Pentagon shake-up.

The SM81 is about 350 new. Like right on the source.

I find the response quite flat ... no hype and the reproduction very accurate and predicable.

Huh ... Dick, please note English is not my native language, so leave room for some wording and spelling errors. Why are Yes King Crimson Pink Floyd Deep Purple Led Zeppelin never described as a boy band image?

I am shopping for a mic for recording acoustic guitar. Re: Overhead Mics: Shure SM94 or Rode NT5 « Reply #4 on: November 29, 2008, 01:22:27 pm » I got to hear them for an hour at a guitar center in another town and after that i was sold, I grabbed a pair for $250 on a great discount deal and cant wait to try em out

Or other suggestions in that price range.

The SM81 is about 350 new. I am not quite up to speed on what a cardioid mic vs condensor is. Experiment with the distance, the results will vary based on the environment you're playing in. A pair of NT5s go for about 400. But I am interested in a small diaphragm mic. "This isn't some upside down inverted Socratic method where you throw out your best guess answers and I correct your work." I did listen to doug's recordings of the AT2020 and I thought they sounded great. Sweetwater has these mics listed under the condensor category. Which would produce the best quality?

You would be a lot happier with the results from the NT5 if you bought the stereo pair, Rode mics are very warm and full and sound fantastic on acoustics. (Read 3288 times), Quote from: Mal Brown on March 22, 2018, 12:32:48 am, Quote from: Helge A Bentsen on March 22, 2018, 05:20:57 am, Quote from: Joe Pieternella on March 22, 2018, 06:23:17 am. or is there a difference? Rode NT5. Anyone ever thought of remaking music theory.

Forums for Audio Professionals, Run by Audio Professionals. I have used Rode NTK and Rode NT1-A with pretty decent results. Rode NT5 or Shure SM81? And hopefully the mic will reproduce that. or is there a difference?

Very interesting. And it is so easy to forget that the sound comes from the player and the instrument. Sound Forums Network, LLC was co-founded by David Karol and Bennett Prescott to provide and preserve a home for audio professionals around the world. As OU812 stated, an SM81, is better suited for drum overheads, it's frequency response works better for recording cymbals.

.

Portishead Dummy Production, Dailymotion Columbo Season 9, Bibia Be Ye Ye Genius, What Does Of Stand For On Tiktok, Ferrum College Phone Number,